Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Memory 81.4 1-Core 37.8 2-Core 75.6 44% 64.9 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 337 28% 244 Pts	64-Core 338 21% 338 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 69%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
3J430048WHHKAS 750GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 100 97 87 108 107 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.2% Below average	Read 105 Write 74.5 Mixed 92.7 SusWrite 101 21% 93.3 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 27 4K Mixed 18.7 61% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 56.9 DQ Mixed 62.2 52% 75.5 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 33%
SafeNet HASP HL drive 2GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 02f0 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 4.9 5.4 5.7 5.7 5.5 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	5.98% Terrible	Read 22 Write 5 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 5.1 11% 9.95 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 28% 2 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.98% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GB 13,765 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 17.8 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 14.4 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 78 51% 78 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	502x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	301x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	37x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	39x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $99Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	21x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	20x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GBMicronBench 50%, 5,422 samples	17x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	14x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100