HP OMEN X by HP Desktop PC 900-1XX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN X by HP Desktop PC 900-1XX  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82E0
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170525
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateDec 28 '18 at 14:24
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$232
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 137
2-Core 260
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 590
63% 504 Pts
64-Core 644
40% 644 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580
HP(103C 840E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.8% Average
Lighting 55.5
Reflection 64.2
Parallax 75.2
45% 64.9 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 54.8
Splatting 53.2
47% 57.9 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 718 726 719 741 816 807 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,414
Write 740
Mixed 738
SusWrite 754
203% 912 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 62.9
206% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,151
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 390
370% 604 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 199%
Great: 262%
WD WD8000AARS-00Y5B1 800GB
213GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 73 71 72 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 61
Write 61.7
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 71.8
40% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 57%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
713GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 105 105 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 84.5
Write 118
Mixed 84
SusWrite 105
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.7
176% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 63%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
188GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 70 70 69 71 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 63
Write 69
Mixed 31
SusWrite 70.3
79% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 43%
hp v135w 4GB
4GB free, PID 3407
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 8.4 8.4 8.2 8.4 8.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
7.47% Terrible
Read 24.7
Write 4.5
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 8.2
12% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
33% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.47%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5110MB78HAF-2400 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.5% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 19
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 18.6
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN X by HP Desktop PC 900-1XX Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

System: HP OMEN X by HP Desktop PC 900-1XX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $496
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback