Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateDec 27 '18 at 02:18
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 214
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 550
56% 452 Pts
64-Core 567
35% 567 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.8% Good
Lighting 77.9
Reflection 76.8
Parallax 73.4
64% 76.1 fps
MRender 70.5
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 72.3
58% 71.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 187 178 178 180 176 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 432
Mixed 363
SusWrite 207
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 43.6
143% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 363
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
140GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 137 134 135 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 149
Write 139
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 135
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 113%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
97GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 91 90 90 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 50.7
Write 53.2
Mixed 28
SusWrite 90.6
78% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 44%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB
38GB free, PID 61b3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 52 52 49 49 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 81.5
Write 56.7
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 50.3
77% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 42%
SanDisk Cruzer 16GB
14GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.4 4.4 4.2 4.3 4.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
9.31% Terrible
Read 19.8
Write 12
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 4.5
15% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.8
127% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.31%
Great: 17%
Inateck 160GB
13GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 51 52 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 56.3
Write 58.7
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 51.4
67% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 22%
PI-239 USB 2.0 Drive 500GB
84GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 42 41 41 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 38.8
Write 36
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 41.2
51% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 22%
Inateck 500GB
77GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.8% Very poor
Read 22.7
Write 22.5
Mixed 21
SusWrite 23.3
31% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4G KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.9% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback