Today's hottest deals

Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAlienware Aurora-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0FPV4P
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateDec 24 '18 at 10:40
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$98
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 100
2-Core 171
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 566
56% 456 Pts
64-Core 699
43% 699 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Nvidia(10DE 105A) 3GB
CLim: 1335 MHz, MLim: 1624 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
47.5% Average
Lighting 56
Reflection 54
Parallax 72.4
46% 60.8 fps
MRender 73
Gravity 67.3
Splatting 51.8
51% 64 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$130
490GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 36 50 77 80 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 69.5
Write 12.7
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 57.1
40% 52.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST3000DM001-1CH166 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 196 208 206 208 208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 168
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 202
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 115%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
MC Read 35
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 33
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,788 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback