Lenovo 7034DN3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 7034DN3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120110
Uptime3 Days
Run DateDec 24 '18 at 00:55
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 170
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 258
34% 255 Pts
64-Core 282
18% 282 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 26.3
Parallax 36.5
29% 32.8 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 33
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 30 27 29 43 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 82.5
Write 94
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 34.1
47% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.1
44% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 74%
Maxone USB 3.0 1TB
640GB free, PID 0000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 22 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 22.2
Write 21.5
Mixed 1.3
SusWrite 22.6
22% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 M378B5673EH1-CH9 M378B5673EH1-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback