Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

5 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Memory 68.7 1-Core 27.6 2-Core 55.4 35% 50.6 Pts	4-Core 110 8-Core 113 15% 111 Pts	64-Core 108 7% 108 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174 49,592 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Sapphire(174B E221) 2GB CLim: 920 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.9.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Lighting 27.8 Reflection 29.7 Parallax 33.2 23% 30.2 fps	MRender 26.5 Gravity 22.1 Splatting 35 24% 27.8 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 21%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ARRAY 500GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 417GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 110 123 126 133 140 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Read 140 Write 137 Mixed 59 SusWrite 124 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 190% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 4.9 15% 5.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.5 15% 5.33 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	107x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	14x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	20x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	10x
GeForce 8800 GTNvidiaBench 6%, 5,568 samples	10x

SSD
CS900 1TB SSDPNYBench 78%, 7,281 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
MZ5PA064HMCD-01000 64GBSamsungBench 30%, 84 samples	5x

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $192