ADD TO PC
BUILD

QBEX DH55TC__

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	QBEX DH55TC__ (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DH55TC
Memory	4.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100722
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 21 '18 at 17:25
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Memory 70.5 1-Core 80.4 2-Core 145 58% 98.6 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 193 25% 187 Pts	64-Core 203 12% 203 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.9% Below average	Lighting 39.5 Reflection 31.7 Parallax 42.4 32% 37.9 fps	MRender 39.1 Gravity 38.9 Splatting 36.9 31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 81 87 91 106 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 166 Write 129 Mixed 100 SusWrite 93.6 27% 122 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 21.5 74% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 25.3 DQ Write 59.9 DQ Mixed 24.2 24% 36.5 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 73%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21 168,449 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 86GB free Firmware: 0002LVM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 65 66 67 67 67 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 83.1 Write 75.3 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 66.4 48% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 61%
MB0500EBNCR 500GB 887 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 24GB free Firmware: HPG0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 72 71 80 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 111 Write 112 Mixed 67.2 SusWrite 75.7 67% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 78%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70 21,848 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 308GB free Firmware: 0002DEM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 72 71 80 82 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 100 Write 100 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 75.7 58% 79.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 62%
WD A MQ01A External 320GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 191GB free, PID 1010 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 25 25 25 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.9% Very poor	Read 27.5 Write 17.8 Mixed 7.3 SusWrite 24.5 24% 19.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot PSD32G13332 3x2GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.6% Below average	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 11.9 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 8.8 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback