Gigabyte B450M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte B450M DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte B450M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '18 at 18:34
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 77.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 228
75% 135 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 743
76% 611 Pts
64-Core 971
60% 971 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Lighting 47.1
Reflection 35.1
Parallax 42.3
38% 41.5 fps
MRender 42.7
Gravity 45.5
Splatting 40.6
35% 43 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 119 72 127 72 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 504
Write 423
Mixed 416
SusWrite 139
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 13.6
4K Mixed 1.1
55% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 5.5
DQ Mixed 0.3
17% 45.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 86%
Mushkin MKNSSDCR060GB 60GB
10GB free
Firmware: 320ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 60 59 60 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 179
Write 59.5
Mixed 94
SusWrite 59.3
22% 98 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 29
106% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 81.7
DQ Write 62.2
DQ Mixed 69.5
53% 71.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 48%
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
47GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 47 56 60 42 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 506
Write 439
Mixed 420
SusWrite 112
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 1.1
64% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 1
77% 180 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$50
624GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 151 151 151 151 151 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 131
Write 131
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 149
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 87%
WD WD6400AAVS-00G9B1 640GB
219GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 59 60 58 57 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 57.5
Mixed 40
SusWrite 58
40% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 48%
Samsung HM500JI 500GB-$100
310GB free
Firmware: 2AC101C4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 73 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
40% Average
Read 69.3
Write 35.5
Mixed 45
SusWrite 70.1
41% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 40%
Great: 47%
WDC WD25 00BEVS-22UST0 250GB
233GB free, PID 0216
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.24% Terrible
Read 33
Write 5
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 5.1
13% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
32% 0.47 MB/s
WD 820AS External 320GB
188GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.6% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 19.2
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 39.3
42% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$33
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
78.6% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 26.2
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 23.1
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450M DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 16,696 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M DS3H - $95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $432
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback