Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 19 '18 at 08:21
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 77
2-Core 138
60% 99.2 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 297
39% 295 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Lighting 70.6
Reflection 69.3
Parallax 60.5
58% 66.8 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 68.3
Splatting 70.7
58% 70.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 512GB-$95
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 412 421 428 421 429 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 425
Mixed 399
SusWrite 406
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 39.1
127% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 257
210% 296 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
566GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 147 149 148 148 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 140
Write 138
Mixed 93.2
SusWrite 145
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 109%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
5GB free, PID c75d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 3.6 4.9 7.2 3.8 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
7.54% Terrible
Read 29.3
Write 3.2
Mixed 3.2
SusWrite 4.5
9% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
52% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.54%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M1A1600C10 04CD F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.8% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 17.8
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback