Lenovo 10MNS0M600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10MNS0M600  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3106
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '18 at 01:39
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 88.1
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 119
60% 94.1 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 254
25% 206 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 3106) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4590
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.46% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 8
Parallax 4.81
5% 6.3 fps
MRender 5.24
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 11.5
6% 7.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.46%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asmt 2115 250GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 285 214 298 298 264 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 331
Write 295
Mixed 254
SusWrite 276
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 20.2
61% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 96.5
76% 104 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 72%
HitachiG ST 507GB
439GB free, PID 1014
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 40 40 41 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.8% Above average
Read 40.8
Write 40.3
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 40.3
55% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 9.8
843% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 12.1
DQ Write 18
DQ Mixed 14.1
1,137% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.1% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.9
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 8.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback