Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$163 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	46.6% Average	Memory 78.1 1-Core 32.8 2-Core 60 40% 57 Pts	4-Core 88.5 8-Core 106 13% 97.4 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 336C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.7 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.2% Above average	Lighting 40.3 Reflection 65.2 Parallax 121 33% 75.4 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 126 Splatting 105 93% 114 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 110%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 123 109 102 108 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	66.3% Good	Read 432 Write 285 Mixed 304 SusWrite 120 64% 285 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 32 99% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 222 DQ Mixed 226 172% 234 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3400 C16 4x8GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	MC Read 16 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 20.7 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 10.8 22% 7.67 GB/s	Latency 84.1 48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 125%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	305x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	288x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	127x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	284x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	247x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	201x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $697