Gigabyte GA-P55-UD6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55-UD6  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100211
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 16 '18 at 14:05
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 94.1
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 150
67% 108 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 356
38% 305 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Lighting 41.9
Reflection 29.2
Parallax 37
34% 36 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 43.1
Splatting 36.7
32% 39.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 120GB-$80
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M2CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 153 179 185 186 185 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.4% Above average
Read 205
Write 200
Mixed 123
SusWrite 171
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 32.3
102% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 165
126% 168 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 115%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
1TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 109 115 116 117 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 115
Write 108
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 112
72% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
886GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 97 101 102 104 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 103
Write 104
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 99.5
67% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 69%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$125
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 93 105 108 109 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 116
Write 116
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 101
73% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 99%
ST6000DM 001-1XY17Z 6TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 0 0 0 0 2.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 160
Write 105
Mixed 68
SusWrite 0.6
96% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
124% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 72%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 0 0 0 0 2.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 119
Write 113
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 0.6
89% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 65%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
4.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 152
Write 109
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 27.7
110% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
135% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 65%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 108
Write 111
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 27.5
100% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 65%
HGST HDN 721010ALE604 10TB
4.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.7 9 9.1 9.1 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.1% Average
Read 166
Write 114
Mixed 88.1
SusWrite 9.2
112% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 62%
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 102
Write 104
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 26.8
94% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.4
124% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 48%
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB
5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 8.7 9 9.1 9.1 9.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.2% Below average
Read 151
Write 110
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 9
98% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.4
120% 1.5 MB/s
HGST HDN 721010ALE604 10TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 8.7 9 9.1 9.2 9.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.8% Average
Read 169
Write 114
Mixed 89.7
SusWrite 9
114% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.1
232% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
40.3% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55-UD6 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55-UD6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $619
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback