Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH315-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Sienta_CFS
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateDec 16 '18 at 03:00
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 121
2-Core 226
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 634
70% 551 Pts
64-Core 766
47% 766 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1262) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5018
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.69% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 69.4
Parallax 6.84
6% 27.7 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 6.77
Splatting 13.6
9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.69%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1263) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Lighting 65.3
Reflection 73.4
Parallax 58.1
53% 65.6 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 60.9
Splatting 65.2
52% 64 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 565 285 126 109 108 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 857
Write 559
Mixed 596
SusWrite 217
124% 557 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 42.5
149% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 499
DQ Mixed 320
262% 365 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 111%
Great: 157%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
299GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 473 473 467 473 481 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 469
Mixed 388
SusWrite 471
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 49.5
163% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 348
263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%
Seagate Slim BK 500GB
321GB free
Firmware: 6405
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 72 71 72 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 57.7
Write 69.5
Mixed 47
SusWrite 71.9
45% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 61%
TOSHIBA MK2555GSX 250GB
153GB free, PID 0214
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 34.8
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 37.7
46% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.5% Very good
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 19.8
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 22
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-51 Builds (Compare 3,917 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback