Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 12 '18 at 22:23
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 94.1
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 130
57% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 434
41% 342 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Lighting 23.7
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 21
19% 20.8 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 24.2
Splatting 17.6
18% 22.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 223 233 227 226 226 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 381
Write 331
Mixed 297
SusWrite 233
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 38.4
133% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 148
127% 185 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 97%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$49
252GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 28 15 74 63 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
50% Average
Read 128
Write 131
Mixed 104
SusWrite 45.6
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50%
Great: 105%
Hitachi HTS727575A9E364 750GB
503GB free, PID 5106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 111 112 112 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 108
Write 112
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 111
129% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 19.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 13.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 758 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback