Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '18 at 04:47
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 122
56% 90 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 295
30% 242 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5750
XFX(1682 2980) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
9.14% Terrible
Lighting 12
Reflection 9.46
Parallax 9.91
10% 10.5 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 10.9
8% 9.49 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.14%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
516GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 131 140 134 145 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 150
Write 164
Mixed 80.1
SusWrite 136
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
17GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 88 89 86 84 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 84.2
Write 78.1
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 85.5
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 69%
WDC WD10 EACS-00D6B0 1TB
537GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 29
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 25.9
38% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 40%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB
496GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
7.7% Terrible
Read 21.6
Write 29.7
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 3.3
27% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.7%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBBNAUDEBA 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.1% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $606
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback