Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Opteron 3380 31 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	48.7% Average	Memory 68.7 1-Core 43.7 2-Core 86.3 43% 66.2 Pts	4-Core 161 8-Core 204 23% 183 Pts	64-Core 287 18% 287 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon 550 2,864 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Sapphire(1DA2 E367) 2GB CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.12.1 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Lighting 19 Reflection 26.2 Parallax 22.9 16% 22.7 fps	MRender 26.1 Gravity 16.1 Splatting 29.4 20% 23.9 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016) 20,831 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 76 69 58 68 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31% Below average	Read 151 Write 75.5 Mixed 134 SusWrite 72.8 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 21.1 4K Mixed 2.7 42% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 218 DQ Mixed 33.2 72% 146 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 70%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$9 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 9GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 7.8 7.6 5 5.8 4.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 28.4 Write 11.9 Mixed 19.4 SusWrite 7 20% 16.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Mixed 1.3 89% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 31%
Hitachi HCC545025B9A 250GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 15GB free, PID 0237 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 21 23 22 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 26 Write 27.2 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 21.5 33% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB 48,796 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 10.1 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 7.9 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	35x
NMUD380D81-1600C 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 485 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	24x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16