Asrock X470 Master SLI/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X470 Master SLI/ac  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180704
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 08 '18 at 02:03
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 76.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 243
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 706
71% 576 Pts
64-Core 956
59% 956 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.1.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36% Below average
Lighting 45.7
Reflection 50.8
Parallax 59.8
37% 52.1 fps
MRender 49
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 36.4
34% 41.8 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD T00 StoreMI 1.5TB
945GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 167 168 168 155 150 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.4% Above average
Read 201
Write 138
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 161
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 30.7
92% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 73.9
DQ Mixed 97.4
83% 126 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 110%
AMD VDRIVE 203GB
189GB free
Firmware: 000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 95 77 96 68 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 436
Write 95
Mixed 146
SusWrite 82
41% 190 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 31.6
105% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 74.6
DQ Mixed 108
90% 135 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 96%
MD4000GBDS 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01K04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 134 134 135 134 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 138
Write 132
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 134
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.2
228% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 93%
Asmt ASM1153E 250GB
88GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 28.3
Write 29
Mixed 26
SusWrite 43.8
24% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 40%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
1TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 103 102 101 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 126
Write 128
Mixed 93.7
SusWrite 102
151% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 60%
Verbatim STORE N GO 32GB
29GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 7.4 6.1 6.7 6.4 6.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
4.18% Terrible
Read 17.7
Write 16.3
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 6
16% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.18%
Great: 10%
Generic External 1TB
514GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 40 40 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 36
Write 37
Mixed 27
SusWrite 39.2
48% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.2% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 11.7
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 Master SLI/ac Builds (Compare 529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Master SLI/ac - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $649
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback