Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H77M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130731
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 22 '16 at 13:26
Run Duration430 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220T-$80
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220T CPU @ 2.80GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 140
61% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 193
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.68% Terrible
Lighting 1.73
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 1.31
1% 1.59 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 3.39
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.68%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 422
Write 105
Mixed 153
49% 227 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 11.8
80% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 23.6
DQ Write 71.6
DQ Mixed 10.4
19% 35.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 75%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
16GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 91.2
Write 78.3
Mixed 79.8
63% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.16
92% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 84%
A-DATA USB Flash Drive 16GB
4GB free, PID d04a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.74% Terrible
Read 22.6
Write 4.44
Mixed 7.29
11% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
8% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.74%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-015.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H77M-D3H Builds (Compare 1,281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $483
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback