Asus P7H55-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7H55-M  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 0 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '18 at 17:50
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3470
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 95.6
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 137
65% 103 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 405
41% 332 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1542 MHz, MLim: 1584 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 21.3
17% 20.3 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 24
Splatting 18.5
18% 23.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Y6-120G 120GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02T130S4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 1.4 47 4.5 34 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.3% Good
Read 200
Write 150
Mixed 125
SusWrite 31.9
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 66%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
187GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 89 80 88 83 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 84
Write 90
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 84.7
50% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 103%
Seagate ST3120022A 120GB-$143
44GB free
Firmware: 8.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 32 30 32 31 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 7.7
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 31.3
15% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 16
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 11
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 55.2
72% 55.2 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55-M Builds (Compare 453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback