MSI FM2-A75IA-E53 (MS-7792)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7792
MotherboardMSI FM2-A75IA-E53 (MS-7792)  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130424
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateJun 19 '16 at 18:57
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 92
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 136
62% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 228
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D + HD 7700 Dual Graphics
XFX(1682 3248) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
7.08% Terrible
Lighting 8.93
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 13.4
7% 11 fps
MRender 6.19
Gravity 8.97
Splatting 8.91
7% 8.02 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.08%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31
414GB free
Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 501
Write 326
Mixed 335
86% 387 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 9.61
63% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 46
65% 121 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 101%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 480
Write 113
Mixed 155
54% 249 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 17
92% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 23.8
DQ Write 72.3
DQ Mixed 14.2
21% 36.8 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.6% Average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 13
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2-A75IA-E53 (MS-7792) Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI FM2-A75IA-E53 (MS-7792)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $806
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback