Today's hottest deals

Medionpc MS-7616

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMedionpc MS-7616  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDIONPC MS-7616
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100115
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateDec 02 '18 at 14:57
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$42
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 61.6
1-Core 56.2
2-Core 96.5
44% 71.4 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 159
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
MSI(1462 2020) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.68% Terrible
Lighting 3.23
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 1.34
3% 3.17 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 3.22
3% 3.45 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.68%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 40GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102HD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 20 39 25 36 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 190
Write 41.5
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 31
18% 82 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 10
54% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 41.7
DQ Mixed 59.3
51% 77.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 36%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 114 115 115 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 124
Write 112
Mixed 74
SusWrite 114
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 67%
FUJITSU MHW2120BH 120GB
40GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 17 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
9.19% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 17.5
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 17.1
23% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.19%
Great: 16%
Mass Storage Device 120GB
100GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.1 16 17 16 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Read 3
Write 2.7
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 13.6
8% 5.5 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
0, 0 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
25% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 11
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.7
15% 5.37 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7616 Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Medionpc MS-7616

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $184
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback