Gigabyte GA-Z370M D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemGigabyte Z370M D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370M D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '18 at 14:33
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 95.8
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
85% 148 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 460
62% 460 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Lighting 45.2
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 37.9
37% 37.9 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 40.5
Splatting 35.9
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$45
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V6005-a9 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 582 659 561 29 58 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 704
Write 641
Mixed 548
SusWrite 324
124% 554 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 55.9
206% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 405
DQ Mixed 291
233% 320 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 126%
Great: 140%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
492GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 133 132 131 134 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 138
Write 135
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 131
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 84%
WDC WD30 EZRX-22D8PB0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.6 4.6 5.6 4.8 4.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.3% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 30.5
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 4.7
32% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.3 MB/s
WDC WD20 EZRX-22D8PB0 2TB
2TB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 36 38 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.6% Poor
Read 37
Write 30.7
Mixed 30
SusWrite 36.5
45% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 185
Write 79.8
Mixed 36.2
103% 100 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
38% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 34%
Mass Storage Device 32GB
29GB free, PID 125d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 11 13 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 13.2
Write 12.8
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 14.3
18% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 3.3
221% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x4GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 29
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 38.3
SC Mixed 28.5
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370M D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,406 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370M D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $398
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback