Gigabyte GA-Z97X-SLI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive278% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z97X-SLI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-SLI-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '18 at 05:26
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 244
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 656
64% 526 Pts
64-Core 608
38% 608 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4996) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 118
Parallax 105
91% 112 fps
MRender 96
Gravity 103
Splatting 97
81% 98.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1856 877 615 518 610 614 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 2,068
Write 1,882
Mixed 1,188
SusWrite 848
334% 1,497 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 88.4
304% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,218
DQ Write 1,010
DQ Mixed 1,040
799% 1,089 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 278%
Great: 340%
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
26GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 63 54 54 53 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 352
Write 158
Mixed 132
SusWrite 59.1
38% 175 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 26.7
102% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 55.9
DQ Mixed 81.6
85% 147 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 105%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
503GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 119 119 120 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 127
Write 132
Mixed 73
SusWrite 118
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 112%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$28
141GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 56 60 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 68.3
Write 68
Mixed 38
SusWrite 59
43% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
79% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 43%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 5400
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 1.3 1.1 2.5 1.1 1.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.22% Terrible
Read 8.2
Write 3
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 1.6
5% 4.25 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
38% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.22%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
56.1% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16.5
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 61.1
66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-SLI-CF Builds (Compare 1,908 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-SLI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback