Today's hottest deals

Daten P8Q67-M-DO/BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
8 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardDaten P8Q67-M-DO/BR  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111031
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 16 '16 at 13:31
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$173
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 194
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 476
48% 393 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000D
Nvidia(10DE 0914) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.17.12.7652
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.59% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 8.96
Parallax 6.25
6% 7.7 fps
MRender 9.81
Gravity 6.87
Splatting 8.61
7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.59%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
888GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC4B
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 150
Write 161
Mixed 53.8
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.39
86% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 112%
Kingston DataTraveler 108 16GB
13GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Read 18
Write 4.53
Mixed 5.91
10% 9.48 MB/s
4K Read 4.02
4K Write 0.002
4K Mixed 0.005
15% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DATEN 4G3D33 L0312 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Q67-M-DO/BR Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Daten P8Q67-M-DO/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback