Asrock X79 Extreme9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme9  (all builds)
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120605
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 26 '18 at 10:46
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 92.4
2-Core 185
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 550
56% 454 Pts
64-Core 697
43% 697 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 3979) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1601 MHz, MLim: 1827 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Lighting 70.5
Reflection 73.7
Parallax 66.3
58% 70.2 fps
MRender 76
Gravity 67.3
Splatting 63
56% 68.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 252 212 223 243 215 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 467
Write 298
Mixed 240
SusWrite 236
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 22.9
84% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 81.3
DQ Mixed 107
78% 102 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 86%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
55GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 142 142 141 142 142 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 451
Write 318
Mixed 346
SusWrite 175
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 31.1
105% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 160
122% 165 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST3400633AS 400GB-$155
100GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 49 45 48 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 53
Write 32.7
Mixed 41
SusWrite 48
32% 43.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Seri 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.6% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 21.6
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 12.1
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Extreme9 Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme9 - $1,200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,474
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback