Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6174 69 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Memory 61.1 1-Core 32.4 2-Core 64.4 35% 52.6 Pts	4-Core 129 8-Core 259 23% 194 Pts	64-Core 706 44% 706 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 120GB-$82 4,735 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 65 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.6% Below average	Read 170 Write 116 Mixed 134 SusWrite 10.9 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 38.2 4K Mixed 24.8 80% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 24.6 DQ Write 66.8 DQ Mixed 32.4 29% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 98%
AMD 2X2 Raid10 1TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 842GB free Firmware: 1.10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 164 243 242 244 244 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 230 Write 58.8 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 190 95% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 1 244% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 16x4GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 16 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.5% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 12.2 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 7.1 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16