MSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 24 '18 at 23:44
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7470K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 57.3
2-Core 106
52% 81.8 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 106
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 72.2
Parallax 63.8
0% 45.3 fps
MRender 75
Gravity 67.4
Splatting 58.2
54% 66.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
728GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 151 150 143 148 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 154
Write 164
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 147
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40
298GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 0 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 117
Write 48.9
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 2
43% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.7% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 4.7
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 7
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 1,084 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $63
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback