Today's hottest deals

Asus E402SA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 9%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus E402SA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E402SA
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '18 at 18:49
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N3700
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.47% Terrible
Memory 5.22
1-Core 22.8
2-Core 41.7
12% 23.2 Pts
4-Core 70.7
8-Core 49.5
9% 60.1 Pts
64-Core 45
3% 45 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 8.47%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Asus(1043 1D5D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4703
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.91% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 2.97
0% 1.6 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.91%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM0B1J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 39 73 81 82 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 72.3
Write 78.2
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 71.2
44% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF1G64HDZ-1G6A1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 3.9
14% 5.07 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 1.3
5% 1.77 GB/s
Latency 451
9% 451 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E402SA Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus E402SA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback