Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '18 at 11:48
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 263
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 454
63% 468 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 89%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 138 134 137 137 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 400
Write 154
Mixed 196
SusWrite 135
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 36.6
155% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 118
97% 138 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 83%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
99GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 435 302 245 250 247 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 426
Write 431
Mixed 388
SusWrite 316
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 42.8
160% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 323
238% 314 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 197 197 198 198 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 148
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 196
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
128GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 156 159 163 159 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 133
Write 101
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 158
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 112%
USB Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.4 6.1 6.4 6.1 6.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Read 19.8
Write 9.7
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 6.2
12% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 8%
S31B0810 USB DISK 1GB
1GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.4 4.4 4 4.4 4.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.81% Terrible
Read 17.3
Write 2.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 4.2
7% 7.18 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
41% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 6%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
15GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 23.5
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 22
34% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
53% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$50
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.6% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.6
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 16.4
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,008
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback