Asus P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '18 at 15:41
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 95.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 231
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 598
65% 518 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
EVGA(3842 0784) 3GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
47.9% Average
Lighting 57.4
Reflection 53.2
Parallax 78.4
47% 63 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 66.5
Splatting 51
50% 62.8 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 4 256GB-$35
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 37 49 78 72 162 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.5% Average
Read 181
Write 46.3
Mixed 139
SusWrite 71.7
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 26
89% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 187
140% 185 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
221GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 80 77 79 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 92
Write 68
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 77.4
55% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
376GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 69 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 97.8
Write 95.8
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 70.5
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 70%
WD 5000AAV External 500GB
466GB free, PID 0910
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.4 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 23.8
Write 14.5
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 7.6
19% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 22%
MAXTOR S TM3500630A 500GB
80GB free, PID 6830
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7.5 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.89% Terrible
Read 23.3
Write 14.8
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 7.6
20% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.89%
Great: 12%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
2TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.5 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 23.3
Write 14.3
Mixed 16.8
SusWrite 7.6
19% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
65.8% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 20.6
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 22.6
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT Builds (Compare 163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback