Alienware Aurora

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Aurora  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 04VWF2
Memory2.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100730
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateJun 08 '16 at 16:57
Run Duration509 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$144
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 94
1-Core 68
2-Core 165
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 418
42% 341 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6472
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39% Below average
Lighting 51.5
Reflection 47.2
Parallax 42.2
42% 47 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 39.3
33% 40.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 460 120GB-$200
10GB free
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.6% Above average
Read 261
Write 171
Mixed 218
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 20.6
88% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 74.4
85% 147 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 100%
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.2% Above average
Read 264
Write 222
Mixed 214
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 20.1
84% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 44.8
69% 131 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
734GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 106
Write 83.7
Mixed 26.9
53% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.45
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 68%
TRUSTED Mass Storage 4.5TB
932GB free, PID 4d10
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
9.32% Terrible
Read 1.66
Write 14.2
Mixed 13.5
15% 9.78 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.17
73% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.32%
Great: 19%
SDHC Card 16GB
15GB free, PID null
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 22
Write 19.4
Mixed 19
25% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 1.01
88% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 24%
Compact Flash Card 4GB
0GB free, PID null
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
8.9% Terrible
Read 38.8
Write 11.4
Mixed 14.9
23% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
13% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.9%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 6 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 18.5
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 12.9
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 49%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora Builds (Compare 510 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Alienware Aurora

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback