Sony VPCEB36GM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSony VPCEB36GM  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101006
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 15 '18 at 11:34
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User PRY-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
45% Average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 68.9
2-Core 112
49% 81.2 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 136
21% 149 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Sony(104D 9071) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.93% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.27
Parallax 0.94
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.93%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
286GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 206 204 205 206 206 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.5% Average
Read 219
Write 200
Mixed 203
SusWrite 204
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 18.6
59% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 19.7
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 117
80% 92.8 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 124%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
509GB free
Firmware: 1306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 29
Write 21.5
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 16.3
17% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB
925GB free, PID 70f5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 26.2
Write 20.5
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 14.2
25% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.3% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 9.5
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 5.9
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback