PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell OptiPlex 9020 |
Motherboard | Dell OptiPlex 9020 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181024 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 14 '18 at 04:45 |
Run Duration | 175 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 42% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
37.3%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 30 32 42 44 36 MB/s
|
25.4%
Poor
|
|||
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
282GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 30 31 40 47 38 MB/s
|
28.1%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 500GB
4GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 13 15 29 30 30 MB/s
|
15.7%
Very poor
|
|||
JMicron 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 26 29 36 37 37 MB/s
|
19.2%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 3,472x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 2,222x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 1,853x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 3,555x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 713x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 684x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $178 |