Asus P8P67 LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 LE  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 12 '18 at 19:21
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 214
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 409
54% 404 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
Asus(1043 0344) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.301.1001.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 13
12% 13.1 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 12.7
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 136 124 125 125 128 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.3% Average
Read 227
Write 122
Mixed 145
SusWrite 131
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 28.5
94% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 56.8
DQ Mixed 32.2
27% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
24GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 70 71 67 65 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 105
Write 96.5
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 70.3
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 69%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
67GB free
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 63 64 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 69.3
Write 30.4
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 64.2
37% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 44%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
755GB free
Firmware: 1AG01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 70 71 67 65 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 60.6
Write 32.5
Mixed 46.6
SusWrite 70.3
39% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 59%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$11
43GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 8.9 8.8 8.9 8.8 9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
8.15% Terrible
Read 27.2
Write 6.5
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 9.2
18% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.3
74% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.15%
Great: 30%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 8GB
4GB free, PID dc5a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 6.4 6.2 6.8 6.6 6.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.53% Terrible
Read 5.2
Write 2.5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 6.4
6% 4.65 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.53%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.5
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 LE Builds (Compare 1,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 LE - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $639
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback