Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 75.8 2-Core 141 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 237 8-Core 251 32% 244 Pts	64-Core 272 17% 272 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Gainward(10B0 1381) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Lighting 19.1 Reflection 15.3 Parallax 16.3 16% 16.9 fps	MRender 22.4 Gravity 18.6 Splatting 16 15% 19 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 33 37 37 39 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Read 56.8 Write 60.3 Mixed 52 SusWrite 34.9 38% 51 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 57%
Imation Expert M200 500GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 182GB free, PID 1911 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 30 31 31 31 31 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 18.5 Write 23.5 Mixed 24.3 SusWrite 29.7 34% 24 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	41.9% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 14.6 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 11.3 SC Mixed 12.4 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM