Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual E2200-$54 8,325 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	34% Below average	Memory 59.9 1-Core 25.6 2-Core 50.4 32% 45.3 Pts	4-Core 50.1 8-Core 50.7 7% 50.4 Pts	64-Core 49.6 3% 49.6 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6700 4,583 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B E144) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	4.62% Terrible	Lighting 3.63 Reflection 5.04 Parallax 2.69 3% 3.79 fps	MRender 8.76 Gravity 8.5 Splatting 10.9 8% 9.38 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 4.62% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 510 Series 120GB 2,171 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: PPG4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 130 171 178 166 176 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.2% Below average	Read 187 Write 11.4 Mixed 146 SusWrite 151 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 25.5 4K Mixed 16.4 55% 18.4 MB/s	DQ Read 19.6 DQ Write 42.9 DQ Mixed 18.5 18% 27 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 60%
WDC WD10 JPVX-00JC3T0 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 10GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 25 28 28 29 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 27.7 Mixed 18.9 SusWrite 26.5 34% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 2.7 11% 3.7 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 4.6 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	3x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	3x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $150Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	2x
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples	2x

SSD
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	2x
Fury 120GBHyperX $160Bench 64%, 11,403 samples	2x
850 120GBSamsungBench 95%, 3,514 samples	1x

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $260