Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7A32
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180126
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 09 '18 at 05:47
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 69.4 1-Core 111 2-Core 219 73% 133 Pts	4-Core 443 8-Core 841 76% 642 Pts	64-Core 1,175 73% 1,175 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	122% Outstanding	Lighting 166 Reflection 194 Parallax 188 135% 182 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 170 Splatting 125 113% 140 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 120GB 3,551 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 447 Write 383 Mixed 346 87% 392 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 81.3 4K Mixed 49.4 160% 55.3 MB/s	DQ Read 300 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 293 220% 292 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 112%
PNY CS1311 960GB-$195 1,486 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4GB free Firmware: CS131122 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 404 Write 351 Mixed 311 79% 356 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 61.8 4K Mixed 33.8 112% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 195 178% 273 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 2GB free, PID 2775 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 106 Write 105 Mixed 59 111% 89.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 46%
WDC WD20 03FZEX-00Z4SA0 2TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1TB free, PID 2775 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 123 143 139 132 135 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 114 Write 104 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 130 145% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB 6,151 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.9% Below average	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 10.7 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 12.2 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 143%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	54x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	53x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	52x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	89x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	74x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $702

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16