Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '18 at 12:04
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User MKD-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 89
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 186
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 366
40% 318 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.10.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.7% Poor
Lighting 36.8
Reflection 27.9
Parallax 45.7
30% 36.8 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 34.5
26% 31.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$88
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 324 111 111 103 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 452
Write 384
Mixed 292
SusWrite 184
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 12.8
52% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 339
242% 311 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
486GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 92 93 94 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 101
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 93.4
65% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 62%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
7GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 47 47 49 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 46.3
Write 49.5
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 47.9
32% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 57%
RDP8 SD/microSD 16GB
6GB free, PID 5038
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 18.7
Write 17.8
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 17.7
24% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 3.1
197% 3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 18.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.5
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,679 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback