Asrock H67M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H67M  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111201
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 01 '18 at 01:00
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$47
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 125
63% 98.8 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 197
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0102) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.03% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.16 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.52 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.03%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 71 61 56 59 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 353
Write 315
Mixed 113
SusWrite 83.8
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 21.6
84% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 30.2
DQ Write 94.7
DQ Mixed 32.2
33% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
18GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 69 69 69 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 132
Write 132
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 68.2
71% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
318GB free
Firmware: KC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 117 116 116 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 124
Write 123
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 116
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
96GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 117 120 120 119 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 73.5
Write 76.6
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 115
53% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.4
198% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 88%
WDC WD25 00BEKT-75PVMT0 250GB
101GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 38 39 39 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 40.3
Write 37.1
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 38.1
49% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/8G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.8% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14.3
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 11.6
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67M Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H67M - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback