Asrock H170M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H170M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 01 '16 at 00:10
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$46
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 212
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 324
44% 328 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
EVGA(3842 1950) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6822
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 33.4
Parallax 30
30% 33.3 fps
MRender 36.1
Gravity 31.7
Splatting 31.9
27% 33.2 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 491
Write 299
Mixed 343
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 4.01
66% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 15.6
DQ Write 70.9
DQ Mixed 3.02
14% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58%
Great: 86%
Hitachi HDT721032SLA380 320GB
18GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19% Very poor
Read 38.3
Write 41.9
Mixed 9.46
36% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.25
57% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR2 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 23.8
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 26.5
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M Pro4 Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H170M Pro4 - $118

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback