Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 2441AQ9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 2441AQ9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2441AQ9
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '18 at 14:21
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 161
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 366
42% 326 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 47 54 3.9 4.2 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 412
Write 149
Mixed 116
SusWrite 33.4
39% 178 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 13.3
50% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 63.9
DQ Mixed 21.6
34% 67.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 55%
Toshiba MK5061GSY 500GB-$57
242GB free
Firmware: MC102E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 82 88 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
41% Average
Read 56.6
Write 55
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 86
40% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41%
Great: 56%
Generic External 60GB
28GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 16 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 35
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 14.4
35% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HTS543216L9A300 160GB
20GB free, PID 110c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 12 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 36.9
Write 34.8
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 16
36% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 18%
BUFFALO HD-PCU2 640GB
10GB free, PID 01d9
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34.7
Write 22.9
Mixed 30.8
36% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905417-041.A00LF Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 9905417-041.A00LF Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.5
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2441AQ9 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2441AQ9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $340
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback