Alienware M14xR2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAlienware M14xR2  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware M14xR2
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '18 at 05:37
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 181
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 465
49% 392 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Dell(1028 0552) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2932
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.15% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 4.69
Parallax 3.22
4% 4.17 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 8.7
5% 5.65 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.15%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO mSAT 500GB
365GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 445 430 406 298 299 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 438
Mixed 406
SusWrite 383
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 44
135% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 49.4
125% 264 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 101%
Great: 122%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
576GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 444 430 438 437 437 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 426
Mixed 373
SusWrite 434
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 46.3
150% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 49.7
125% 262 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
WDC WD75 00BPKT-75PK4T0 750GB
345GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 89 75 72 69 65 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.7% Average
Read 118
Write 115
Mixed 64.9
SusWrite 77.9
123% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 46%
Mass Storage Device 128GB
6GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 40 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 37.9
Write 36.9
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 40.8
53% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 9
716% 9.63 MB/s
DQ Read 10.9
DQ Write 15.7
DQ Mixed 10
914% 12.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI NT8GC64B8HB0NS-DI 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M14xR2 Builds (Compare 298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware M14xR2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback