Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory0.2 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime19.3 Days
Run DateOct 25 '18 at 00:37
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-12xx v2 (Ivy Bridge)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Memory 51.1
1-Core 45.2
2-Core 60.6
34% 52.3 Pts
4-Core 93.9
8-Core 86
12% 89.9 Pts
64-Core 94
6% 94 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 21GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 22 32 40 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 23.8
Write 7.2
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 25.9
16% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
149% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 81%
Yottabyt tier2 2GB
2GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 181
Write 52.7
Mixed 77.2
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 3.4
558% 3.17 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x1GB
1 of 1 slots used
1GB DIMM RAM
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
22.9% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 0.4
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback