Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53 4,803 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Memory 76.4 1-Core 64.5 2-Core 137 56% 92.6 Pts	4-Core 272 8-Core 475 45% 374 Pts	64-Core 798 49% 798 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34% Below average	Lighting 41.7 Reflection 40.4 Parallax 40.8 34% 41 fps	MRender 50.9 Gravity 36.9 Splatting 39 34% 42.2 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$86 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 786GB free (System drive) Firmware: 020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 409 404 402 361 375 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Read 421 Write 398 Mixed 394 SusWrite 396 91% 402 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 54.8 4K Mixed 34.6 114% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 391 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 298 242% 343 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 169 166 163 166 178 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
TOSHIBA MK6025GAS 60GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 1GB free, PID 6830 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.8 7.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	1.18% Terrible	Read 2.7 Write 2.5 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 3.6 4% 2.88 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.18% Great: 11%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB 18,040 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2TB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 103 103 104 99 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 59.9 Write 84.8 Mixed 43.6 SusWrite 102 102% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 7.7 4K Mixed 0.5 280% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 64GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	79.7% Very good	MC Read 34.1 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 29.3 90% 31.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9.3 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 87.4 46% 87.4 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	497x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	307x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	261x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	184x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	112x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	57x
9JSF51272AZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 78%, 366 samples	55x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16