Asrock Z97 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '18 at 05:50
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 0.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 17.3
2-Core 44.1
30% 42.1 Pts
4-Core 48.8
8-Core 49.9
7% 49.3 Pts
64-Core 52.2
3% 52.2 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 22.7
16% 19.2 fps
MRender 25.8
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 16.4
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 306 369 363 326 274 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 409
Write 389
Mixed 378
SusWrite 318
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 26
85% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 120
93% 126 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 129%
ST312081 4A 120GB
111GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.1% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 38
Mixed 29
SusWrite 38.1
49% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 18%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
0GB free, PID a788
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 17.7
Write 3.3
Mixed 2.7
7% 7.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 2.3
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 3.9
16% 5.5 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3.7
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Pro4 Builds (Compare 911 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Pro4 - $77

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $725
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback