Dell Inspiron 5555

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDell Inspiron 5555  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 08C2X1
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160830
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 22 '18 at 20:47
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 60.4
1-Core 37.6
2-Core 75.4
37% 57.8 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 141
19% 143 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Dell(1028 06BF) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.10.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
2.82% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5.42
Parallax 3.97
3% 4.33 fps
MRender 3.24
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.12 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.82%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$45
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 90 94 98 96 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 101
Write 98.6
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 93.1
63% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 62%
CENTON USB DISK 8GB
7GB free, PID null, centon
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.2 2 2.2 2.2 2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.09% Terrible
Read 11.8
Write 1.8
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 2.1
6% 5.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5173EB0-YK0 Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
20.7% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 7
20% 6.83 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Inspiron 5555 Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Inspiron 5555

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback