IBM 3850 M2 / x3950 M2 -[7233AC1]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemIBM 3850 M2 / x3950 M2 -[7233AC1]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM Node1 Processor Card
Memory119.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 0.5 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20101221
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 27 '16 at 12:13
Run Duration60 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E7440
Node 1 CPU 3, 4 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.7% Below average
Memory 47.9
1-Core 34.5
2-Core 69.1
32% 50.5 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 276
24% 207 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 37%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID-MR10k 292GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.40
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32x4GB
32 of 32 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
29.1% Poor
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 11.8
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 2.1
6% 2.23 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback