Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

Performance Results


Gaming 121% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 151% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Professional Gaming (all builds)
Memory	40.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170809
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '18 at 16:33
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Memory 80.1 1-Core 123 2-Core 247 83% 150 Pts	4-Core 492 8-Core 960 86% 726 Pts	64-Core 2,676 166% 2,676 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Zotac(19DA 1471) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	139% Outstanding	Lighting 199 Reflection 209 Parallax 207 162% 205 fps	MRender 133 Gravity 194 Splatting 133 124% 153 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 382GB free Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3369 3335 3412 3423 3425 3410 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	488% Outstanding	Read 4,038 Write 3,427 Mixed 2,079 SusWrite 3,396 725% 3,235 MB/s	4K Read 50.8 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 73.9 252% 92.1 MB/s	DQ Read 954 DQ Write 873 DQ Mixed 893 676% 907 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 488% Great: 363%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,066 Write 1,118 Mixed 704 283% 1,296 MB/s	4K Read 48.4 4K Write 155 4K Mixed 61.9 235% 88.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,059 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 474 404% 613 MB/s
Poor: 138% Great: 283%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$121 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 426GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 99 99 99 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 87.5 Write 91.3 Mixed 67.8 SusWrite 98 64% 86.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$121 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 266GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 145 147 146 149 146 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Read 135 Write 119 Mixed 97.3 SusWrite 145 92% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 99%
USB DISK 2.0 503GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 282GB free, PID 0100 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.5% Very poor	Read 34.5 Write 35.8 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 37.3 48% 34.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 60% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 8x8GB 184 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81% Excellent	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 26.8 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 32.4 SC Mixed 27 79% 27.7 GB/s	Latency 80.3 50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 145%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 121%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	58x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	43x
Ryzen TR 2990WXAMD $790Bench 79%, 3,658 samples	38x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	35x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	21x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	13x

SSD
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	12x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	7x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3866 C18 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 102%, 1,063 samples	9x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 112%, 4,962 samples	7x
F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR 64GBUnknownBench 102%, 20 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,030

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16