Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150526
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 21 '18 at 12:08
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 236
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 458
60% 452 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
37.8% Below average
Lighting 49.3
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 62.5
40% 46.5 fps
MRender 31.5
Gravity 48.5
Splatting 41.2
33% 40.4 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Innovation IT 120GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 419
Write 317
Mixed 33
56% 256 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 15.3
69% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 20.8
41% 83.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 105%
WD WD3202ABYS-02B7A0 320GB
27GB free
Firmware: 3B03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 92 93 93 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 92.4
Write 91.6
Mixed 66.1
SusWrite 92.1
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
700GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 135 135 135 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 147
Write 142
Mixed 109
SusWrite 135
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 1TB
101GB free, PID 1048
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 77 77 78 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 80.4
Write 81.5
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 77.2
97% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 43%
HGST HTS 545050A7E380 500GB
39GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 80 83 83 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 79
Write 78.2
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 81.6
89% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 38%
SAMSUNG HM080JI 80GB
15GB free, PID 0c15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 31 30 30 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.9% Very poor
Read 29
Write 32.2
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 30.3
38% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Maxtor OneTouch 500GB
95GB free, PID 7310
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 40.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 10
SusWrite 42.4
29% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 20
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 18
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback