Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20236

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20236  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '18 at 14:01
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User MNG-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 2020M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 83.1
1-Core 65.1
2-Core 114
55% 87.4 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 116
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3800) 2GB
CLim: 825 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.75% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 1.38
2% 1.66 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.52
2% 2.75 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.75%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0630A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 66 64 77 49 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 428
Write 310
Mixed 112
SusWrite 70
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 15.5
64% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 87.2
DQ Mixed 28.2
45% 86.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 75%
It-ceo Storage 1TB
765GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 31
Write 26
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 27.5
20% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 16.8
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 13.9
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20236 Builds (Compare 969 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20236

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback